You may have noticed that the same prayer has been at the top of the notice sheet for the last few weeks. This is the prayer written for a new initiative from the Bishop of Chester called “Growth action planning.” The Bishop wants to encourage all parishes in the Diocese to ask some very important questions: What should our parish be like five years from now? What are two or three important priorities that we should
focus upon to achieve this? We have to send back to the Bishop a short form indicating the conclusions that we have come to. In consultation with members of the ministry team and the PCC I have drawn out three main areas for growth in our parish:
1. Numerical Growth
Wilmslow is growing and changing. As a parish we have to respond to this. We cannot stand still. There are new housing estates at Summerfields and the Villas. We need to make connections with those people. With the loss of St Francis Hall, the church presence in Lacey Green has become less prominent. To try to address this we have begun and would like to develop Messy Church up in Lacey Green Primary school. This has brought us into contact with a significant number of new individuals and families. We have leafleted nearly 500 households in particular parts of Wilmslow, including Morley Green, the Villas and Styal, as a way of trying to make sure that people know that we are here and what we are like. The parish website is being developed as an important shop window for people moving into the parish. Indeed, one woman came to a service at St Anne’s last Sunday having moved into the area recently and because she looked at the website. These are ways of trying to get new people into church. We are exploring others as well.
2. Growth in Discipleship
Christians need to grow. Faith is a journey. Like the Church, faith grows and changes in response to situations and events in our lives and in our community. If we are to be effective witnesses in our community we should be learning and growing in our faith. If people come into church we have to provide ways in which they can explore and grow in Christian faith. That’s why we’re running God for grown ups, confirmation classes and other discipleship courses. We are looking to set up home groups to help encourage and nurture Christian discipleship.
3. Growing Together
St Anne’s and St Bart’s are part of one parish with Anchor Court and Messy Church. Jesus’ last command to his disciples in John’s Gospel is that we should love one another. Being a united parish is a way to demonstrate to the wider world that being a Christian actually makes a difference to the quality of our relationships. It is the quality of the network of our relationships that is one of the most effective ways in which we draw others into the life of the church. People want to belong. Social events like the wine-tasting have helped to make this real – people of different ages and backgrounds from the two churches coming together and enjoying time together and getting to know one another.
But part of this growth action planning is specific to St Bart’s. Just over a year ago, of course, we opened the new extension. We have already begun to use that for meetings and for Sunday School. But we need further both to repair and develop these premises so that they cater for the growth that we are experiencing – e.g. the Story
Service and Phoenix are growing – and also to encourage further growth and development in its different forms. To this end the PCC agreed that we should set up a new project team to look at the development of the interior of the church. This group was deliberately set up with a variety of people involved representing different age groups and points of view.
The aim was to unite around a vision that we could all agree on. Inevitably this vision has been shaped by a number of things. There are things that we’ve all had to compromise on in order to find a common vision. There are constraints imposed by the Church authorities on what we can do. For example, it is clear that the Church planners, the DAC, will not allow us to re-locate the chancel screen to the back of church as many had wished – at least not at the moment. Within these parameters, the project team has united behind a way forward that I would like to summarise under three main headings as follows:
1. Interior Improvements
The wooden joists that hold up the wooden part of the floor where the pews are situated are rotting. This part of the floor is slowly sinking. This has got to be fixed. There is simply no choice in the matter. Before we know what is the best method for fixing the problem the archaeologists will have to do a survey to find out what’s underneath the floor. Once they’ve done that we will have an idea of the options available to us in terms of a new or repaired floor, and what kind of covering we might put on that floor.
The sound system in St Bart’s can be very frustrating both for the people leading worship and the people trying to take part in worship. We need to
replace or radically improve it.
The lighting also needs to be improved so that we can show this beautiful building off to the best of its potential.
Within this scheme of interior improvements would also be the right time to consider whether continuing the process of cleaning the inside of the church is the right thing to do or not.
2. Flexibility
In all of its thinking, the project team was conscious of the balance in a building like St Bart’s between it being a heritage space, a worship space and a community space. Whilst respecting the importance of this building as a heritage space, the need for greater flexibility was an important consideration. Why greater flexibility? Because at present the organ cannot be used as a recital or teaching instrument. Because the 9.30am Story Service is growing rapidly, yet is cramped at the back of church on old chairs. Because the present arrangement does not easily accommodate people using wheelchairs.
So, how to create greater flexibility without undermining the importance of this church as a heritage space and also maintaining the seating capacity of the church? It seemed to us that the right thing to do was not simply to take out all the pews and replace them with chairs. This doesn’t necessarily create greater flexibility, and someone has to do the work of moving them all around!
Further, replacing all the pews with chairs would significantly reduce the capacity of the church and prevent us from holding some of our larger
services. The solution being proposed by the project team is simply to remove the front section of four pews on each side and to replace them with 40-50 high quality chairs. This would allow flexibility whilst leaving the majority of the pews in place. This would also not significantly reduce the capacity of the church.
It would allow the organ console to be detached and placed on the other side of the church (by the entrance to the Styal Chapel), and the organ itself developed so that we could have organ recitals and tuition taking place here. The piano could also be more easily positioned for concerts, recitals and other community events. Visiting choirs and small orchestras could be much more easily accommodated. Individual chairs are easy to remove or move around so that somebody in a wheelchair can sit within the body of the congregation. The Story Service would also be much more comfortably accommodated within the building and would be able further to grow.
There was, many years ago, a mezzanine floor at the back of church. In consultation with the bell ringers, we would like to re-introduce this so that the ringers can go physically up a level and we can have a trolley or two of folding chairs that can be stored in the bell-tower and brought out for use at our larger services.
3. Fellowship
There are many ways in which the
family of the church can celebrate its most important meal together – Holy Communion. At the moment we have what we might call a pilgrimage
pattern. The priest at the altar is significantly separated from the rest of the congregation by distance and by the chancel screen. People come up quite a long way to two separate altars as if on a pilgrimage or journey towards God. There is nothing wrong with that at all. That is perfectly good and valid. But there are other ways of celebrating Holy Communion which also emphasize important things about what we believe as Christians and that help us to stay
connected to Jesus’ celebration of the Last Supper with His friends.
As Christians we believe not only in a transcendent God, a God beyond us, but also an immanent God, a God who is close to us, in our midst. That is the very point of the festivals of Christmas and Easter – God comes among us and on the cross breaks down the barriers that separate us from Him. That is the very point of the service of Holy Communion – to celebrate this belief. Our building and our worship need to express this. Ponder this for a moment.
When Jesus celebrated the Last supper with His friends He did it not separated from them by a big screen and by a long distance – effectively in another room – as far as we can tell He was in the same room with His friends gathered around Him – around one table. The final command that He gave to them was that they should love one another as He had loved them.
In other words, our relationship with God is inseparable from our relationship with each other as members of the family of the Church. Christian faith is never simply the flight of the alone to the alone. As I mentioned before, it is the network of our relationships that is one of the most effective ways in which we draw others into the life of the Church.
The project team would like to suggest a way of us all celebrating Holy Communion around one table in one room. That is by introducing a nave altar platform – not like the temporary staging – but a genuinely integrated piece of liturgical furniture.
There would be a new removable altar and removable altar rails. You would be able to see me, or whoever is presiding at the service, much more easily. You would be able to see the bread broken and the wine poured out in front of you as Jesus did with His friends at the last supper. God and human beings are brought together, reconciled, as the festivals of Christmas and Easter proclaim.
What the project team is proposing is that the 8am and 6.30pm services
remain exactly as they are, using the chancel and the high altar. But the 10.30am parish Communion would use the nave altar, except on the fifth
Sunday of the month, when we would use the high altar, and we would
continue to use the high altar for
Midnight Mass at Christmas and for a Communion service perhaps on the
Saturday evening at Easter.
Remembrance Sunday would continue to use the chancel and high altar as usual (although this isn’t a Communion service). So, it isn’t that the high altar would become redundant; it is about moving to a more mixed economy of using a nave altar and a high altar on different occasions and for different services. Such a platform could also be extended to help accommodate visiting choirs and other groups for greater community use of our premises.
One other very important aspect of all of this that I want to emphasise is that apart from the flooring, everything that the project team is suggesting is reversible. If, in 20 years, the next generation thinks that this was all wrong, pews can be replaced and the nave altar platform removed.
On a personal note, I appreciate that change can be unsettling. It can sometimes feel like a lot is changing. We all like what we are familiar with. But Christian faith has to strike a balance between honouring and handing on what is good from the past, whilst also having the courage to adapt and change so that we can respond effectively to the needs and challenges of the present and journey onwards into the future.
So far, this proposal has been discussed and approved by the ministry team, the management team, and by the PCC. At the last PCC meeting it was agreed unanimously with one abstention.
From here, the way forward would be to consult particular groups such as the bell ringers and the choir, and then to begin to involve the Church’s planners, the DAC, and to employ a conservation-trained architect to design and manage the project.
If you have any thoughts, comments or questions about any of the above material, please do not hesitate to contact me or any member of the project team by Easter at the latest.
Paul